CLICK
HERE FOR THE RARE HARD TO FIND - ALMOST LOST FOREVER - FAMOUS CHOMSKY VS RICHARD
PERLE DEBATE (who is
Richard
Perle?}
-2006-chomsky-Binghamton-U-March8-06-hour2of2.mp3
-2006-chomsky-060226-mediamatters-will-am.mp3
-2006-Chomsky-on-rendition-flights-RTEnews-jan-19-06.mp3
-2006-chomsky--ucd-jan-19-2006.mp3
-2006-chomsky-democracy-now-2006-0331.mp3
-2006-Chomsky-democracy-now-2006-0403.mp3
-2006-chomsky-ucd-jan-17-06.mp3
-2006-Chomsky-Challenge-Facing-Mankind-BBC-Jan2006.mp3
-2005-On-Fake-News-NoOne-Listening-December-2005.mp3
-2005-Chomsky-Basic-View-of-the-World-Oct-2005.mp3
-2005-Chomsky-On-Imperial-Ambitions-The-Speakeasy-December-12-2005.mp3
-2005-Chomsky-on-Iraq-elections-Dec2005.mp3
-2005-2005-chomsky-45min-mit-iraqQ&A.mp3
-2005-april-2005-chomsky-1hr-interview.mp3
-2005-90-min-chomsky-lecture
at--mit-april-2005.mp3
-2005-chomsky-washington-state-lecture-2005.mp3
-2005-chomsky-1hour-debate-alan-dershowitz-over-isreal-and-palestine-nov2005.mp3
-2005-60 min speech:
2005chomskymit.mp3 30 min Q&A:
2005chomsky-q&a.mp3
Noam Chomsky TOPIC:
The Militarization of Science and Space
February 15, 2004 LOCATION: Kresge
Auditorium MIT
Lannan Readings & Conversations Noam Chomsky with Tariq Ali Wednesday January 26 2005
The-corporation-hour-1of2.mp3 The-corporation-hour-2of2.mp3
The University of Edinburgh Gifford Lectures 2004/05
Professor Noam Chomsky "Illegal but Legitimate: a Dubious Doctrine for the Times." recorded on the 22nd March 2
original actual audio video stream: http://www.edinburgh.ac.uk/explore/video/chomsky.html
14meg 1hr 23min audio only file: http://jokebook.com/Chomsky-mp3-storage/chomsky-Edinburgh-lecture-3-05.mp3
Noam Chomsky on C-SPAN BookTV Format:mp3 Runtime: 2h 58 min
Video Stream Rip of Chomsky's 2003 appearance on C-SPAN BookTV. Viewers call in asking questions.
chomsky-call -in-hour-1of3.mp3 10.5 megs 60mins
(at 42 min. into this file chomsky is asked fi 9/11 could have been a false
flag operation of if it could have been let happen on purpose and chomsky
responds that he is "extremely skeptical about it", that "i don't think there is
any likelihood that an action like this could have been planned <by white
house>" and " i don't really think there are any historical precedence for it"
and "if the white house had been involved in the planning of this.....it would
have certainly have leaked..... i don't think the evidence is at all compelling"
chomsky-call -in-hour-2of3.mp3 16.2 megs 90mins chomsky-call -in-hour-3of3.mp3 5.2 megs 30mins
The simple reason why I presume that the official story is probably true is that it seems to me by far the most credible one. I’ve explained why in earlier posts, and also why the whole matter is very far from high priority for me.
Since there is such a flood of letters about this matter, mostly to me personally, perhaps it is worth adding something that I’ve left out because I do not want to become embroiled in what seem to me pointless discussions, diverting energy from matters that seem to me far more important.
One of these is to focus attention on the Bush administration’s ongoing contributions to enhancing the risk of terrorism, including very serious terrorist attacks against the US. Even if the cyberspace and other conclusions about 9/11 were credible they would not begin to compare with Bush administration actions that are hardly controversial and that have or threaten far more hideous effects. In comparison with these clear cases, for which evidence is overwhelming from the most respectable mainstream sources, the involvement of the Bush administration in 9/11, if it could be supported, would amount to very little. To take an obvious example, consider the invasion of Iraq.
Quite apart from the massive crimes against Iraqis, the invasion was undertaken with the expectation, since amply confirmed, that it would increase the threat of jihadist terror of the kind that the Reaganites organized in the 1980s, as well as proliferation. Former defense secretaries (including McNamara) and prominent strategic analysts estimate the likelihood of nuclear terror in the US at about 50% in the next decade: alongside that, and its likely aftermath, 9/11 would pale into insignificance. And that’s the least of it. The policies of aggressive militarism and “transformation of the military” are, as predicted, driving potential rivals to react in ways that greatly enhance the risk of possibly terminal nuclear war, maybe by accident, maybe by leaking of WMD technology to terrorists, maybe in other ways.
All of these matters are well-established, rarely discussed, and vastly more significant that any possible Bush administration involvement in 9/11.
…I might perhaps add that this whole matter reminds of a DOD document on
declassification a few years ago. It suggests that “interesting declassified
material” such as information about the JFK assassination could be released and
even posted on the internet as a “diversion,”
which might “reduce the unrestrained public appetite for `secrets’ by providing
good faith distraction material.” The idea, according to the
(outstanding) British intelligence analyst who published the document, is that
if investigators are absorbed with the grassy knoll they won’t probe into
serious areas where they are unwelcome
--------
Left Denial on 9/11 Turns Irrational
by Jack Straw
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/05/1736367.php 6 May 2005
www.globalresearch.ca 8 May 2005
The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/STR505A.html
People like Noam Chomsky and Ward Churchill are turning toward the irrational as
they continue to deny increasing signs that 9/11 was an inside job.
Ever since the events of 9/11, the American Left and even ultra-Left have been
downright fanatical in combating notions that the U.S. government was complicit
in the attacks or at least had foreknowledge of the events. Lately, this stance
has taken a turn towards the irrational.
In a recent interview, Noam Chomsky has made an incredible assertion:
"There's by now a small industry on the thesis that the administration had
something to do with 9-11. I've looked at some of it, and have often been asked.
There's a weak thesis that is possible though extremely unlikely in my opinion,
and a strong thesis that is close to inconceivable. The weak thesis is that they
knew about it and didn't try to stop it. The strong thesis is that they were
actually involved. The evidence for either thesis is, in my opinion, based on a
failure to understand properly what evidence is. Even in controlled scientific
experiments one finds all sorts of unexplained phenomena, strange coincidences,
loose ends, apparent contradictions, etc. Read the letters in technical science
journals and you'll find plenty of samples. In real world situations, chaos is
overwhelming, and these will mount to the sky. That aside, they'd have had to be
quite mad to try anything like that. It would have had to involve a large number
of people, something would be very likely to leak, pretty quickly, they'd all be
lined up before firing squads and the Republican Party would be dead forever.
That would have happened whether the plan succeeded or not, and success was at
best a long shot; it would have been extremely hard to predict what would
happen."
Various related mp3 files
end-of-oil.mp3 oil-alter TMVideo1 TMVideo2 ArtWork
David Ray Griffin's Madison, Wisconsin lecture from C-span's website http://www.septembereleventh.org/documents/drg_cspan.mp3
The full Clint Curtis sworn testimony
12 MINUTE 2 MEGABIT CLINTON CURTIS MP3 FILE TIM BERNARD-LEE MP3
NOAM CHOMSKY AUDIO FILE LINKS
11-15-01 Chomsky Talk at at MIT (audio)
Chomsky: Aussie Radioio 11-17-01(audio)
|
01/16/2001 |
Noam Chomsky, Propaganda and Control of the Public |
Noam Chomsky, Prpaganda and Control of the Public Mind.
|
|
01/16/2001 |
Noam Chomsky, Propaganda and Control of the Public |
Noam Chomsky, Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind.
|
|
Case Studies in Hypocrisy: |
Chomsky reveals the true motives behind America's "human
rights" policies-particularly in Iraq. |
March 13, 2000 Professor Noam Chomsky, the outspoken MIT linguistics
professor and prominent political dissident, gave a standing-room-only crowd his
views on globalization, military intervention, sovereignty and world trade as
part of
the
Johns Hopkins Symposium on Foreign Affairs. .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/speech/ram/achomsky.ram
http://www.interlog.com/~nealm/ra.html
Interview with Matthew Rothschild, editor of The Progressive.
RealAudio
version. |
|||
With Charlayne Hunter-Gault. Produced by Globalvision. |
|||
With Shelagh Rogers. (3/21/95, 25 minutes). |
In a Q&A session following a lecture, a young person asks if capitalism,
despite its flaws, is justified because of rising living standards. |
|||
| The Common Good (Audio) |
Details the historical roots of democratic rights -- from Aristotle to the US
Constitutional Convention -- and questions the role of today's private
corporations that want to "undermine democratic functioning but ensure that
there will be a powerful state to subsidize them," as Chomsky puts it. The
complete text of this interview with David Barsamian is published in the Odonian
Press book The Common Good.
Published by
Making Contact
(9/24/97, 30 minutes).
Activists continue to call for an end to economic sanctions against Iraq -- sanctions that UN studies say kill 4,500 children under five each month. Professor Noam Chomsky, author and critic, joins to talk about U.S. "policy" in the Middle East and the media's role.
NOAM CHOMSKY Hard Choice MP3 | Real
6.26.01
These are links to the whole CDs in RealAudio format. To get only some parts, go to the above page for specific links.
The Clinton Vision , in 22 separate clips (56 mins), or the whole CD in one large file.
Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind NOTE: This is a link to the Z Mag page for this CD. Only certain segments are available in RealAudio format -- see this page for the links.
Free Market Fantasies: Capitalism in the Real World, , a link to the whole CD (56 mins). The page is here.
Capital Rules , the whole CD (56 mins.). The page is here.
Class War: The Attack on Working People , the whole CD. The page is here.
Prospects for Democracy , the whole CD. The page is here.
Noam Chomsky, "The New World Order: Latin America and the Middle East", at www. freespeech.org.
Noam Chomsky, on Indoctrination and Propaganda in the US -- the Media (interview). 15.08 min.
Richard Lewontin, "Biology as Ideology / The Doctrine of DNA", The Massey Lectures for 1990.
Interview with the authors of Fear and Favor in the Newsroom, on media bias caused by corporate ownership.
"Workers Fight Gannett Evil." Union fights Gannett Corp. in Detroit newspaper strike.
The McLibel Lawsuit, against McDonald's Corp.
"A Crash Course for Citizens on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment", from British Columbia. Very interesting, but with a Canadian nationalist focus.
I c. Language and Linguistics
A. From The Cyberschool pages - two on-line A.P. English courses in Oregon, by skilled Internet teacher Fawn Bragg.
C. Chaucer
D. Streaming Video
E. My Lectures
F. Other Medieval Literature
1. Old English
- Selection from King Alfred's translation of Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy, Meter 6, from Florian Schleburg's page at the University of Augsburg, Germany.
- Old English version of parable of the Seven Wise and Seven Foolish Virgins (Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Reader, p. 64), from same page.
- The Last Survivor's Speech, from Beowulf (at this location).
- Old English Pages - Audio Corpus. A few mor OE files linked by Cathy Ball.
The following poetic passages are from Ða Engliscan Gesiþas Home Page, "Old English Aloud".
- Deor, in verses. Verse 1; Verse 2; Verse 3; Verse 4; Verse 5; Verse 6a; Verse 6b.
- "The Funeral of Scyld Scefing", from Beowulf. Verses 26 to 31; Verses 32 to 37; Verses 38 to 42; Verses 43 to 46; Verses 47 to 52.
- The Battle of Brunanburh. Get the individual verses from the page itself.
2. Middle English
- The first fit of Sir Gawain and the Grene Knight, from U. GA.(female voice)
- The same text, from the University of Vermont (male voice -- Albert C. Baugh?)
- A different male voice, from the third fit, also U. VT.
- Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (ca. 1360): lines 713-739.
G. Literature, General
H. Bob Price's Lectures
III. The Vietnam War
1. Protest Songs of the Vietnam War and Civil Rights Movement Era
IV. Politics.
A. The Russian (Bolshevik) Revolution
B. Michael Parenti
C. Other Political Tapes
V. Other Academic Lectures
VI. The Internationale!
VII. Other Audio Files
Rare interview with Christopher Lydon on WBUR's The Connection. Note: Unfortunately we only have the first half-hour of this interview. (4/12/99, 60 minutes). |
Audio from Class War
RealAudio requires the
RealAudio 3.0
player. Get the ToolVox player.
| Track | ToolVox | RealAudio 14.4 | RealAudio 28.8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Play the entire disc (56 minutes) | RealAudio 14.4 | RealAudio 28.8 | |
| 1. Intro by David Barsamian (2:28) | ToolVox (44K) | RealAudio 14.4 (142K) | RealAudio 28.8 (271K) |
| 2. Profits before People (1:28) | ToolVox (28K) | RealAudio 14.4 (89K) | RealAudio 28.8 (172K) |
| 3. Culture of Solidarity (3:39) | ToolVox (68K) | RealAudio 14.4 (220K) | RealAudio 28.8 (421K) |
| 4. Praise for Our Magnificence (2:53) | ToolVox (54K) | RealAudio 14.4 (174K) | RealAudio 28.8 (334K) |
| 5. The Undermining of Unions (2:53) | ToolVox (54K) | RealAudio 14.4 (175K) | RealAudio 28.8 (334K) |
| 6. Crime Pays | ToolVox (37K) | RealAudio 14.4 (120K) | RealAudio 28.8 (230K) |
| 7. Economy Up People Down (1:07) | ToolVox (22K) | RealAudio 14.4 (69K) | RealAudio 28.8 (131K) |
| 8. The Globalization of Production (3:35) | ToolVox (66K) | RealAudio 14.4 (217K) | RealAudio 28.8 (413K) |
| 9. Class War (4:06) | ToolVox (76K) | RealAudio 14.4 (249K) | RealAudio 28.8 (473K) |
| 10. Driving People from Defiance to Compliance (1:14) | ToolVox (25K) | RealAudio 14.4 (77K) | RealAudio 28.8 (148K) |
| 11. Technology as a Weapon (2:02) | ToolVox (39K) | RealAudio 14.4 (125K) | RealAudio 28.8 (238K) |
| 12. The Fortune 500: Unaccountable Private Power (5:51) | ToolVox (103K) | RealAudio 14.4 (340K) | RealAudio 28.8 (646K) |
| 13. Social Policy: Welfare for the Rich (6:40) | ToolVox (122K) | RealAudio 14.4 (402K) | RealAudio 28.8 (766K) |
| 14. Propaganda: Corporations Are Your Friends (5:42) | ToolVox (105K) | RealAudio 14.4 (345K) | RealAudio 28.8 (657K) |
| 15. Potential for Fasicsm (2:36) | ToolVox (49K) | RealAudio 14.4 (159K) | RealAudio 28.8 (304K) |
| 16. What Is to Be Done? (0:53) | ToolVox (18K) | RealAudio 14.4 (55K) | RealAudio 28.8 (107K) |
| 17. Oklahoma City and Anti-Politics (5:47) | ToolVox (106K) | RealAudio 14.4 (350K) | RealAudio 28.8 (665K) |
| RealAudio
and Video: Noam Chomsky Unless otherwise stated, all links require
RealPlayer from RealNetworks.
|
WBUR in
Boston interviews Noam Chomsky
Opinions
on Yugoslavia and Kosovo.
LISTEN HERE
Propaganda and Control of
the Public/01/16/2001
The US, Kosovo and History [click
to listen]
Noam Chomsky
Chomsky analyzes the reasons behind the US's intervention in Kosovo and looks at past historical precedents for foreign intervention around the globe.
downloadable audio files
the following Chomsky event audio transcripts consist of two parts: Noam Chomsky's speech and the Q&A session following the speech. Each part is approximately one hour long and is further divided into four 15-minute segments (for a total of eight files).
The digital audio format is MP3 and each file is approximately 13MB for a total of over 100MB. WARNING: these files can take an hour or more each to download!
MP3 players are readily available for free online. A good place to start looking for your own free MP3 player is at www.mp3.com. Popular MP3 player titles include Sonique, Winamp, and UltraPlayer.
|
The Lecture |
The Q & A |
| chomskyqa_01of04.wma | |
| chomsky_02of04.wma | chomskyqa_02of04.wma |
| chomsky_03of04.wma | chomskyqa_03of04.wma |
| chomsky_04of04.wma | chomskyqa_04of04.wma |
Parent Directory 14-Sep-2001 12:26 -Chomsky88pt1.ram 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1k
Chomsky88pt1.rm 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1.7M
Chomsky88pt2.ram 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1k
Chomsky88pt2.rm 05-Aug-1999 13:37 2.0M
Chomsky88pt3.ram 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1k
Chomsky88pt3.rm 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1.6M
Chomsky88pt4.ram 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1k
Chomsky88pt4.rm 05-Aug-1999 13:37 1.9M
http://www.noam-chomsky.com/
Click Here
to learn how to simultaneously download mp3 files and play in sequence
http://www.world-of-chomsky.com/
| 1. |
|
Noam_chomsky_-_vs_-_george_bush stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec http://stream.paranode.com/imc/alberta/noam_chomsky_-_vs_-_george_bush.mp3 |
| 2. |
|
Chomsky_porto_alegre_feb2003_lb uk.indymedia.org, 55 min 11 sec |
| 3. |
|
Washingtondc IndyMedia - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq www.dc.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 4. |
|
Chomsky_nov_4_02_talk boston.indymedia.org, 22 min 13 sec |
| 5. |
|
Chomsky_nov_4_02_talk boston.indymedia.org, 22 min 13 sec |
| 6. |
|
Independent Media Center - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq, indymedia.org www.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 7. |
|
Questions and Answers - Noam Chomsky-Houston 10-18-02 mke.indymedia.org, 86 min 50 sec |
| 8. |
|
- Chomsky Intro Houston101802 mke.indymedia.org, 22 min 35 sec |
| 9. |
|
- Noam Chomsky-Houston TX 101802 mke.indymedia.org, 67 min 59 sec |
| 10. |
|
Cultual Imperialism-Links and Sources Cited - Noam Chomsky on
Globalization (full audio interview), Cultual Imperialism-Links and
Sources Cited www.arts.arizona.edu, 14 min 21 sec |
| 21. |
|
Seattle Indymedia - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq, Seattle Indymedia -
webcast news seattle.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 22. |
|
Independent Media Center - Chomsky-1970, indymedia.org www.indymedia.org, 56 min 43 sec |
| 23. |
|
Government In The Future, Noam Chomsky - Feb 16/1970 www.kpfx.org, 56 min 43 sec |
| 24. |
|
Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq, la.indymedia.org la.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 25. |
|
Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq, la.indymedia.org la.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 26. |
|
Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec |
| 27. |
|
Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec |
| 28. |
|
Boston IndyMedia - Chomsky-vs-bush-iraq boston.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
| 29. |
|
Mayday IndyMedia - Government In The Future, Noam Chomsky - Feb
16/1970 www.indymedia.org, 56 min 43 sec |
| 30. |
|
Boston IndyMedia - Chomsky 1 metafilter.com, 28 min 44 sec |
| 31. |
|
Chomsky- Gravitate server1.sxsw.com, 4 min 9 sec |
| 32. |
|
Chomsky- Gravitate, SXSW 2002 Bands bands sxsw.com, 4 min 9 sec |
| 33. |
|
Enlightenment Principles, Noam Chomsky www.indymedia.org, 3 min 20 sec |
| 34. |
|
Who Killed Noam Chomsky?, TV audio.musicbuilder.com, 5 min 35 sec |
| 35. |
|
Mayday IndyMedia - Enlightenment Principles, Noam Chomsky www.indymedia.org, 3 min 20 sec |
| 36. |
|
Http://www.frognet.net/~absent/NoamBennet.mp3, Chomsky to Debate
William Bennett 5/30 5:20am : SF www.sf.indymedia.org, 8 min 19 sec |
| 37. |
|
Case Studies In Hypocrisy:U.S. Human Rights Policy - U.S. Prisons, Noam
Chomsky: Prisons in America : SF Indymedia sf.indymedia.org, 6 min 19 sec |
| 38. |
|
Between The Lines Week Ending 5/3/02, Between The Lines www.wpkn.org, 29 min 1 sec |
| 39. |
|
Index of /sound, radioproject.org www.radioproject.org, 56 min 21 sec |
| 40. |
|
Program:Narco Cover, Program:Narco Cover www.radioproject.org, 79 min 54 sec |
| 41. |
|
>>EVIL VS. EVIL (mp3), The Ancient Ecstatic Brotherhood of
PARANOISE www.paranoise.com, 3 min 15 sec |
| 42. |
|
Clarence: Cultura e Spettacolo - Società delle Menti - Audio Files (), Clarence:
Cultura e Spettacolo - Società de www.clarence.com, 3 min 40 sec |
| 43. |
|
Fierce Invalids Home From..., Tom Robbins www.clarence.com, 7 min 44 sec |
| 44. |
|
Part 4, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 27 min 6 sec |
| 45. |
|
Part 1, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 36 min 21 sec |
| 46. |
|
Part 3, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 25 min 41 sec |
| 47. |
|
Part 2, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 24 min 34 sec |
| 48. |
|
Burnt Norton, T.S. Eliot www.clarence.com, 10 min 58 sec |
| 49. |
|
G7 Welcoming Committee Records - Releases, G7 Welcoming Committee
Records - Releases www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 3 min 52 sec |
| 50. |
|
If I Told Him, Gertrude Stein www.clarence.com, 3 min 36 sec |
Noam Chomsky
- Welfare for the Rich - in the United States, our tax dollars supply social
welfare for the very rich, while the poor experience the rigors of the free
market. 1.1 megabytes in length.
Noam
Chomsky - Delusion - writers employed by the corporate media are not
necessarily conscious of engaging in deception. Instead, they are completely
persuaded by corporate propaganda. Otherwise they would not be employed. 1
megabyte in length.
Noam
Chomsky - Indoctrination of the very young into the system. How the system
earmarks children for success or failure by their tendency to conform, obey, and
be passive spectators (America's ideal worker). 1.2 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Labor Struggles of the early American factory workers who wrote
that the new spirit of the Age was, "Gain wealth, forgetting all but self."
900k.
Noam Chomsky - Authoritarian Structures work to control the public mind and
crush independent thinking and turn human beings into passive consumers of
mass-marketed products. 300k.
Noam Chomsky
- versus King George the First - exposes the embarrassing facts that Bush
Senior conveniently omitted regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. 4.4 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Free Market Fantasies - what precisely does it mean to be a
conservative in favor of the free market? 5.7 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Hypocrisy: Good Terror - there is "bad" terrorism and "good"
terrorism, according to America's rulers. The "good" terrorism is practiced by
American allies, such as Turkey, who commit atrocities against millions of
"irrelevant" people. 1.8 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky
- Old Wine, New Bottles - 1.1 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky -
Detering the NAFTA debate - 5 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky - Responds to a Question - 3.5 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky - The Globalization of Production
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision (13)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Corporate Attack on Working People (14)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Social Disintegration (17)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Labor Loses in Clinton (20)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : What We Can Do (22)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (1)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (2)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (3)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (4)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (5)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (6)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (7)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (8)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (9)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (10)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (11)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (12)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (13)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (14)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (15)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (16)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (17)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (18)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (19)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (20)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (21)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (22)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (23)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (24)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (25)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (26)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (27)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (xx)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (dis)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (zz)
Noam
Chomsky - Prospects for Democracy : U.S. Repression II (10)
Noam Chomsky
- Free Market Fantasies (05)
Noam
Chomsky - Culture of Solidarity - why labor unions are important to a
democratic society.
Noam Chomsky
- Torture - The Clinton Administration violates Article 14 and forcibly
returns the Haitians to their torture chamber.
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (01) Destroying American Industrial Unions
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (03) The Business Press Explains
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (07) Tyranny is Pure Freedom
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (08) Strikebreakers
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (09) In the Case of Mexico
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (10) Crime Pays
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (15) The Wealthy Classes
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (16) Return to the Trenches
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (17) A Vicious Class War
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (18) Selling the Capitalist Story
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-09)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-10)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-11)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-12)
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (05) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (07) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (09) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (10) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (11) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (16) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (17) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - on Terrorism and the Media - Damon created this MP3 of Noam's
speech at FAIR's 15-year anniversary. (See
http://www.fair.org/chomsky-town.html). He spoke for about an hour about the
war(s) on terrorism and the media. Thanks, Damon! 14 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky: Controlled Asset of New World Order (continued)
by DANIEL L ABRAHAMSON (RENSE.COM)
However, as one begins to examine the interviews and writings of Chomsky, a
different picture emerges. His books, so vociferously lauded in leftist circles,
appear to be calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse honest
activists.
Since the 1960's, Chomsky has acted as the premier Left Gatekeeper, using his
elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.
His formula over the years has stayed consistent -- Blame "America" and
"Corporations" while failing to examine the hidden Globalist overclass which
pulls the strings, using the U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction.
Then after pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky offers
the solution of world government under the United Nations.
In his book "The Conspirator's Hierarchy," Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a
deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr.
Coleman's claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky's role as a
Left Gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government
complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he claims that the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are
"nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal
Reserve and its role in manipulating the cycle of debt.
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent
scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the
obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good for
humanity.
What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for UNESCO,
and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the
UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World Order.
Chomsky's role in the propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl Marx: to
present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the desired
solutions of the elite.
Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality of capitalism and then advocated
a one world bank, army, and government with the abolition of private property
and religion; in other words, the major goals known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by this scam,
failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures of
Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock
Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the
current economic system.
For example, why is wealth distributed so unequally between classes and
countries?
Why are those living in third world nations allowed to die from preventable
diseases and starvation?
Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy?
Why was America attacked on 9-11?
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence?
Who is behind all this suffering?
And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction
plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent.
He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly
pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric.
Chomsky's hero status is further amplified by Left Gatekeeper publications like
"Z Magazine," "DemocracyNow!," "The Progressive," and "The Nation."
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from
Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation,
Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head
gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy
Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore
issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.
The following analysis will show that Chomsky, a deep cover agent for the New
World Order, a master of black propaganda whose true motives become clear with a
sober and honest examination.
911
Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the aftermath of the
9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and claiming any suggestions
of government complicity are fabrications.
The "radical" Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes
the staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently
refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge
and participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist
movements worldwide:
"If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left, in my opinion:
the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly likely that nothing
significant will be found. And if -- which I very greatly doubt -- something is
found that would quickly send everyone in Washington to the death chamber, the
left is unlikely to emerge triumphant."
In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence because
according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence,
responsible activists should ignore it because it would be "the end of the
Left." Chomsky's role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each
piece of evidence individually. The following examples should suffice:
1) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19 hijackers are
alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the remaining 12
were trained as U.S. Air Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of
the accused "religious fanatics" acted more like degenerate contract agents, as
they flashed wads of cash, visited strip clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine,
smoked weed, cavorted with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich
Florida keys.
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man
trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS
regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from
CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence of
these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes (walking through airport
security does not count). Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which
supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers.
Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the hijackers,
Chomsky wrote the following:
"Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that everyone in the
White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what they would have
had to be to try something that would have been very likely to turn into an
utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded, would almost certainly have
leaked, so that they would all be facing the death sentence. Possible, but not
likely."
2) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard
operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they
deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart's single
engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20
minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator
for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking
drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets
crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia.
These "mock" drills, designed to give live on 9-11, helped to distract the
honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic
investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA's Echelon network.
Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the following:
"Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having investigated the matter.
I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from the really serious
issues."
3) How about the document called "Operation Northwoods" signed off in 1962 by
the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men,
sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism
in order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans included the
following:
- "Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to
continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."
- "Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban
agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement
also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."
- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty
lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation."
This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been the subject
of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear evidence that
the U.S. government has designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame
them on foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the Northwoods document
matters:
"Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for being skeptical
about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not carried out. Furthermore,
there is nothing in history that even remotely resembles what is being proposed.
Of course, that does not show that the thesis is impossible: nothing could show
that, by definition. And if someone can put together some evidence and refute
the arguments as to why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be
worth pursuing."
Chomsky's role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is distracting his leftist
followers from the truth.
Instead of facing the clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that
al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy.
When presented with documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the
NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn't exist. He resorts to emotional
"they would never do it" appeals in order to deny the obvious.
Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively
engaging in disinformation.
9-11 Prior Knowledge
Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September 11 is one
thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior knowledge of
the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than Michael Moore's tepid
Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of prior knowledge.
Chomsky's position is untenable. For a man who prides himself on science and
logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream media reports finds him
using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one can show them photographs,
videos, testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of proof is impossible.
Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many government admissions of
prior knowledge widely available even in the 9-11 whitewash commission report.
Here is Noam Chomsky writing on government prior knowledge:
"That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is flooded, daily, with
information of very low credibility. In retrospect, one can sometimes pick out
pieces that mean something. At the time, that's a virtual impossibility. By
arguments like this we can prove that someone blew up the White House
yesterday."
If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and NORAD running drills
that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings in New York, Washington DC
and Virginia? Also, wouldn't the NSA's Echelon network have picked up the
chatter?
Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network exists. This despite
the NSA's openly acknowledged ability to monitor all phone calls, emails and
satellite communication with keyword software which can identify phrases and
immediately begin tracking the communication. This despite their admitted bases
at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and
other unknown locations.
Students of the intelligence world know full well that the NSA's Echelon network
picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact, the NSA admitted
it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from hijackers but,
*ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such admissions are red
herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge at tops levels of
the intelligence circles.
What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late August which
discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence groups like Able
Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the flight school
trainees?
What about FBI agent John O'Neill's investigation into Al-Qaeda financing which
was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David Schippers who desperately tried
to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks?
Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was
FEMA running drills in Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC
documents like "Rebuilding America's Defenses" call for helpful Pearl Harbor
style attacks?
Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving beyond any
reasonable doubt that the U.S. government had prior knowledge. But Chomsky must
deny these, because his role is to mislead and distract while chastising the
9-11 truth movement.
CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission
Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers like Chomsky has
been denying the existence of the overclass which prints the money, funds and
manages the wars, ships the drugs, controls entire industries, and creates the
scientific propaganda which plagues society. Instead they critique mid-level
minions & front corporations while speaking in glittering generalities.
In the world of Left gatekeepers, the New World Order does not exist. There are
no elite plan for global government. Instead they paint the picture of a
profit-motivated world in which corporations control the government. But merely
blaming corporations misses the forces which own their assets, manage their
resources, control their board of directors, and pull their strings.
Chomsky steadfastly denies the role of the Council on Foreign Relations,
Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission in the creation and management
of the wars and poverty he claims to condemn. When speaking on such
"conspiracies," he said the following:
"It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations,
all these other things the people are racing around searching for conspiracy
theories about-they're "nothing" organizations. Of course they're there,
obviously rich people get together and talk to each other, and play golf with
one another, and plan together-that's not a big surprise. But these conspiracy
theories people are putting their energies into have virtually nothing to do
with the way the institutions actually function."
(Understanding Power, 348)
The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after WW II, is an
organization openly sworn to destroying American national sovereignty in favor
of world government. They have acted as the de-facto "secret team" in managing
U.S. domestic and foreign policy, orchestrating wars like Vietnam and the first
Gulf War.. Almost all executives in the CIA and State Department have been
members of the CFR, whether it was Dean Rusk, Allen Dulles and Robert McNamara
during Vietnam or Richard Armitage and George Tenet during the crimes of 9-11.
The CFR has been the dominant roundtable group pushing for a Panamerican Union
by 2010 which would dissolve national borders and unite Mexico, Canada, and
America under a single currency, with biometric ID cards and GPS-tracked
vehicles on camera-strewn superhighways. How can Chomsky seriously claim the CFR
is a "nothing organization" when their role in crafting policy is so clear? Whom
is he trying to protect in denying the treasonous goals of the CFR?
Chomsky's stonewalling on the Bilderberg raises even more suspicions. Since 1954
the Bilderberg has served as the central brain of the New World Order, the major
secret gathering for Globalist agents from across the globe. Bilderberg chairmen
like Prince Bernhard and David Rockefeller have pushed for total global
government, eugenics population control, engineering wars, and controlling the
worldwide economy. Top politicians from America and Europe also undergo a
grooming process at the Bilderberg. Bill Clinton went in 1991 as Rockefeller's
personal guest, and Tony Blair attended in 1993 before becoming Prime Minister.
John Kerry attended in 2000, and John Edwards did two weeks before becoming the
VP nominee in 2004.
Major members of the media, such as editors from the Economist, NY Times,
Newsweek, Washington Post, US News and World Report are regular attendees. Yet
they rarely, if ever, mention the proceedings, sworn to secrecy by their
globalist masters.
Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major media outlets like
the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning for a one-world currency, bank, and
army. Articles in Reuters and the Financial Times of London have admitted the
existence of the Bilderberg,
their grooming of politicians, and their secret plans for world governance. If
these mainstream media reporters can admit the major role of the Bilderberg in
shaping world affairs, why can't Chomsky? Why is he holding back?
Simlarly, how can Chomsky seriously ignore the role of the Trilateral
Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters David Rockefeller and Zbigniew
Brzezinski? This is the same Brzezinski who helped direct the first CIA funds to
bin Laden, and in his book Between Two Ages called for a technotronic society
with a microchipped population.
The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to control the economy
through closer European-Japanese-American cooperation. They operate much like
the CFR, counting the worlds top elites, politicians, corporate executives, and
media barons as members. They have been instrumental in creating the destructive
"free trade" agreements that are destroying America's economy and national
sovereignty in order to usher in world governance.
Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable credentials, also
links the Trilateral Commission to the international narcotics trade, the $500
billion-plus racket from heroin and cocaine alone which helps fund the
Globalist's house of cards.
What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission a "nothing
organization?" Is it because they echo his goal of a world government? Or are
there darker forces at work?
When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence, Chomsky's claims are
exposed as nothing more than spurious lies and denial.
Federal Reserve
Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in America and the Third
World, he has never spoken publicly on the role of the Federal Reserve.
Therefore most Leftist activists are unaware of the role played by this
privately owned bank cartel which prints worthless fiat currency out of thin
air. Since its secret formation at Jekyll Island in 1910, and subsequent illegal
passage during the Wilson administration, the Federal Reserve has held the
American economy hostage: creating inflation and boom & bust cycles through
managed money supply and interest rates.
Furthermore, every dollar printed is merely debt charged to the federal
government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to print a $100 bill, the U.S.
government fits the bill for the full $100 to the private Fed.
The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the Rockefeller, Morgan,
and Rothschild interests has eluded the "radical" Chomsky. Furthermore he does
not discuss the proven role of the Fed in creating recessions and depressions in
order to purchase assets at a fraction of their value.
Chomsky ignores the role of the fiat currency system which drives down wages,
inflates prices, and puts the American economy under the iron claw of a few
elite families. Since the dollar is the base currency for worldwide trade and
the current economic house of cards, shouldn't these topics be discussed?
Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into his ideology. After
all, one of the key planks in the Marxist and Fabian socialist agenda is a
managed central bank in order to control the economy. Or perhaps Chomsky fears
discussion of the Fed would expose the real hidden hand that runs the world
economy. For him it is easier to blast the front corporations and low-level
grocery boys.
The CIA
If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11, should it be any
surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the CIA? When asked about the links
between the CIA and bin Laden, and the CIA's overt support of the Taliban,
Chomsky wrote the following:
"CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate) or the Taliban (also
not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me remotely relevant."
How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply ignoring the
documented evidence of CIA funding for the "freedom fighters" known as al-Qaeda,
totaling over $6 billion. The cozy CIA/al-Qaeda relationship continued through
the Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling Kosovo Liberation Army.
What about the meetings between Taliban leaders, oil executives, and Bush
administration officials from January to August 2001 to discuss building an oil
and gas pipeline for Unocal? Chomsky also denies the mainstream reports from UK
and French newspapers about two top CIA agents meeting with bin Laden for over
ten days in July 2001 while he received dialysis at the American Hospital in
Dubai.
But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique the CIA, he
absolves the agency of any responsibility for its actions, from Nazi origins via
Project Paperclip to heinous mind control experiments like MK ULTRA. This
horrific period in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in understanding the New
World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who sees the CIA as an
innocent victim of White House orders:.
"Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of a lot of these conspiracies;
we have a ton of
information about it, and as I read the information, the CIA is basically just
an obedient branch of the White House. I mean sure, the CIA has done things
around the world- but as far as we know, it hasn't done anything on its own.
There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know of any-that the CIA is some
kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on its own doing things. What the record
shows is that the C.I.A. is just an agency of the White House, which sometimes
carries out operations for which the Executive branch wants what's called
"plausible deniability"; in other words, if something goes wrong, we don't want
it to look like we did, those guys in the CIA did it, and we can throw some of
them to the wolves if we need to. That's basically the role of the CIA, along
with mostly just a collection of information.
(Chomsky, "Understanding Power")
Like all of Chomsky's claims, this one is based on emotion, conjecture, and
opinion. He does not cite any specifics, knowing full well that his fawning
minions will accept his word as gospel.
Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat bureaucrats, acting
as grocery boys for their master President. According to him, the CIA does not
carry out secret projects on their own, and if accused of such, are innocent.
JFK Assassination/CIA Role
Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone assassin and magic
bullet theory in the assassination of JFK? From his emergence as a guru of the
Left in the late 60's, Chomsky has belittled anyone researching the anomolies
stemming from the official story and Warren Commission cover-up. According to
him, any examination is a complete waste of time:
"The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the most striking case. I mean, you
have all these people doing super-scholarly intensive research, and trying to
find out just who talked to whom, and what's the exact contours were of this
supposed high-level conspiracy - it's all complete nonsense. As soon as you look
into the various theories, they always collapse, there's just nothing there. But
in many places, the left has just fallen apart on the basis of these sheer
cults."
(Chomsky, Understanding Power)
Chomsky's position puts him in the less than 15% of Americans who believe Oswald
was the lone shooter. For such a self-proclaimed "anarchist" radical, Chomsky's
trust in Warren Commission's official story seems akin to a child's belief in
Santa Claus.
The facts, of course, tell a different story. While far from perfect man,
Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces that took over after his death. He
began withdrawing 5,000 CIA "advisers" from Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen
Dulles and Richard Bissel; disbanded the CIA and handed over covert operations
to the State Department; ordered the creation of a silver-backed government
currency to break the Federal Reserve monopoly; turned down the Operation
Northwoods plan to engineer false flag terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and
refused to invade Cuba and launch a full scale nuclear war during the Missile
Crisis, a plan favored by hawks like General Curtis LeMay.
Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency because it would
expose te shadow government takeover after his assassination.
What about Chomsky's claims that the CIA never acts as a rogue elephant? Do they
hold up?
MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip
Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind control programs
known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots. This program alone shows how the CIA
was indeed a rogue elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of propaganda,
brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.
In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman began a covert plan to smuggle top Nazi
SS officers, scientists, and propagandists into America. Those same war
criminals quickly became the front line for the postwar U.S. intelligence
machine. Reinhard Gehlen, one of Hitler's top intelligence chiefs, led postwar
European intelligence for the CIA, becoming the darling of head honcho Allen
Dulles.
Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the Vatican, and sponsored
by the CIA, Gehlen set up "rat lines" which smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi
criminals into South and Central America. Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin
Bormann and Josef Mengele among others owed their freedom to this program.
Those same men would later aid CIA coups in Angentina, Chile, Paraguay, Brazil
and other countries. After all, they were veteran experts: early Gehlen projects
had included rigging elections in Italy and France. By 1955, more than 760
German scientists had been became U.S. citizens, many specializing in black
research projects. This growing cabal of Nazi doctors found a happy marriage
with the control freak elitists infesting the NSA, CIA, and black operations
government.
These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind control, via
drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves. It was this mad
science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men
like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates, used for
political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this
was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of pre-adolescent
children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals
and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnaped from American
streets and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the homeless, and
residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they were
defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are
available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which
usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister projects? Why does he
claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the White House, when the record proves that
Eisenhower and Kennedy had little, if any knowledge of MK ULTRA? Simply put: Why
is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?
Elite Child Sex Rings
The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further mention (although
Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice President Bush was caught having 15
year-old call boy prostitutes visiting the White House late at night. The credit
cards records to prove it were splashed across the front page of the Washington
Times: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry Ensnares VIP's with Reagan, Bush Sr."
Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided in his hotel with
piano wire before he could testify. Book like "The Franklin Coverup" by John
DeCamp have further proven the links between the CIA and Army intelligence to
the elite sex slavery rings. Cases of like the "The Finders" in Washington DC,
where customs agents discovered a CIA warehouse full of child porn and satanic
torture, stand as yet further evidence.
In the forrmer Yugloslavia, CIA front company Dyncorp has been convicted of
operating in the human slave trade and using their C-130's to ship many of the
200,000 women and children smuggled out every year. Furthermore, mainstream news
outlets have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers assisting the sex trade in the
Democratic Republic of Congo and Balkans.
Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky has never discussed
the elite sex trade. This is an issue so shocking, so paradigm-altering, that
his Leftist followers would no longer trust their loving mother government, and
that is the last thing Chomsky wants. After all, if the Leftists knew that top
level politicians are actually pedophiles practicing satanic ritual abuse, they
would no longer trust the savior world government. The absence of Chomsky and
the Left on the suffering of these children speaks volumes about their true
moral character and motives.
MK ARTICHOKE/ MK NAOMI:
Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth culture and
attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the latter perfected by Dr. Delgado.
Adjunct programs like MK NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on genetically
engineered viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on American
citizens. Common experiments included testing biological agents and atomic
weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally handicapped, people in subways, and
even whole towns; putting cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and exposing
pregnant women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These experiments
have been documented as continuing into the 1980's and likely still continue
today.
Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because it would awaken his
readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S. government will murder its own
citizens and soldiers, killing hundreds of thousands of unwitting subjects
simply for political gain. After all, if they would feed radiated breakfast
cereal to thousands of retarded children, would these same parasitic elites not
also kill more than 2,800 Americans on September 11?
Fluoride
Of course, MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It was around the time
of its inception, in the 1950's, that the U.S. government began adding sodium
fluoride to tap water in massive quantities.. Should we be shocked? After all,
the first people to use the deadly neurotoxin were the Nazis, who found it
pacified the concentration camp prisoners. Now thanks to imported Nazi doctors
helping our friendly neighborhood CIA, American citizens could enjoy the same
privilege as those in Hitler's camps.
Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride, nor the lead and
arsenic used in water as silent weapons of pacification. As a scientist, he is
apparently uninterested in sodium fluoride's proven link to cancer, leukemia,
osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.
So, should we be surprised that he never writes about the deadly poison
aspartame found in thousands of products? Or genetically modified foods and
growth hormones which destroy immune systems while causing blood disorders and
swelling of the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly microwave radiation
leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to published BBC reports)
altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers which pulse deadly ELF radiation across
America?
Rockefeller Pharma Cartel
The Nazi doctors who didn't end up in American intelligence found cushy jobs in
the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck and Eli-Lilly. Chomsky never
discusses the history of these firms; nor the Rockefeller control over the
American Medical Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted vaccines and
brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI's (Prozac, Zoloft,
etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin pills pimped out to helpless
children.
These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal tendencies and added
depression to the poor kids gobbling them like Flintstone's chewables, all at
the advice of their pill-pusher death merchant doctors. Meanwhile Chomsky stays
true to form, ignoring these matters and instead calling for socialized,
Federally-controlled healthcare which would further subsidize the pharma cartel.
This is just another example of his bait and switch tactics, a sloppy mess of
disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.
Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative
Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from psychiatric
community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers and Tavistock Institute, who
seek to define every neurosis as a mental illness in order to push more drugs.
Bush has signed the New Freedom Initiative to forcibly psychologically test all
K-12 students in public schools, screen them for "mental illnesses," and force
the children to take the recommended drugs.
This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma cartel, with GlaxoSmithKline,
Eli Lilly, Merck and others investing millions in buy-offs and lobbying. But
news of this extraordinary Stalinist plan never graced the pages of Chomsky's
editorials, nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the Progressive, and DemocracyNow.
Perhaps this is because the New Freedom Initiative fits into their goal of
government-controlled socialized health care.
The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin's wildest dreams, is just a small
part of the eugenics agenda; a dominant Globalist goal which Chomsky and his
Left Gatekeeper bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky has never written about the
sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor the role of it's former chief,
Dr. Ewen Cameron, the aforementioned MK ULTRA villain and CIA child programmer.
Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as population control,
abortion legalization, poisonous vaccinations, and stem cell research find their
most vocal advocates on the far Left of the managed political debate. Leftist
college majors like sociology advocate programs like parental licensing by the
state, state-controlled child care, and Chinese style childbirth laws with
forced sterilization as a penalty.
Leftists call for more vaccinations in the Third World despite the admittedly
tainted vaccines used by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. All of this
is indicative of an infiltrated movement, a Left deeply penetrated by Globalist
agents driving activists into unwittingly championing the Brave New World.
Population Control
Population control by any means necessary is a major, some would say the major
goal of the New World Order, perhaps even paramount to their goal of a cashless
society control grid with microchipped slaves. The chief architects of
population control are Bilderberg elitists like David and Nelson Rockefeller,
Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, Ted Turner, Alexander Haig, and Cyrus Vance.
Their Malthusian nightmare requires killing 90% of the "useless eaters" through
war, genetically engineered viruses, and engineered starvation. Declassified
documents like NSM 200 and Global 2000 lay the plans out with cold precision.
Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such depopulation methods.
In Chomsky's book "Understanding Power," a collection of his talks with
activists, a crowd member asks about population control, to which Chomsky
responds:
"If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the human race isn't going to
survive much longer...Yeah, population control is another issue where it doesn't
matter if you do it, everybody has to do it. It's like traffic: I mean you can't
make driving a car survivable by driving well yourself; there has to be kind of
a social contract involved, otherwise it won't work." (61)
Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral high ground, but then
advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite roundtable groups like the
Bilderberg and Club of Rome. How can Chomsky claim to be an advocate for the
Third World while simultaneously pushing for the managed murder agenda favored
by Henry Kissinger?"
Gun Control
Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has been pushing for
unconstitutional gun control agenda through their publications like The Nation,
Z Magazine, The Progressive, and their internet kin at DemocracyNow! & Indymedia.
It is a great achievement of propaganda when the supposed radicals "opposing
Bush" call for a completely disarmed American populace and inflated budget for
BATF thugs in ski masks. Chomsky mock s those who support the Constitutionally
endowed right to bear arms. In fact, he says it doesn't exist:
"It's pretty clear that, taken literally, the Second Amendment doesn't permit
people to have guns. But laws are never taken literally, including amendments to
the Constitution or constitutional rights. Laws permit what the tenor of the
times interprets them as permitting."
(Secrets, Lies, and Democracy)
Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are a proper way to
respond to government tyranny. He responds as follows:
"As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's outlandish. First of all,
this is not a weak Third World country. If people have pistols, the government
has tanks. If people get tanks, the government has atomic weapons. There's no
way to deal with these issues by violent force, even if you think that that's
morally legitimate.
Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make the country more
benign. They're going to make it more brutal, ruthless and destructive. So while
one can recognize the motivation that lies behind some of the opposition to gun
control, I think it's sadly misguided."
(Secrets, Lies and Democracy)
It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian socialists in the
Democratic party. But to have the supposed "fringe radicals" saying there is no
second amendment and advocating gun seizures is remarkable. And because of
globalist infiltration of the left, this policy once favored by Hitler, Stalin,
Mao, and other mass murderers has found a comfortable home. Hence it has become
common to hear activists protesting the Iraq quagmire while simultaneously
calling for gun control.
Environmental Front Groups
As masters of propaganda, the Globalists have uses their Left Gatekeepers to
push eugenics and population control as necessary for the environment. This has
been accomplished through the phony environmental movement and Peak Oil
fabrications.
The Club of Rome, a globalist front group created in 1968, immediately began
calling for population reduction under the guise of environmentalism. Other
fronts like the World Wildlife Fund, managed by the aforementioned Prince
Philip, vocally push for population control while seizing large swaths of land
for "Mother Earth." Other pet projects such as the Kyoto Protocol, which would
give the UN total control of energy resources, have floundered.
Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince Bernhard,
Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad Black, Shell chairman John
Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug
dealer Henry Keswick.
Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real environmental
pollution problems to push for a fascist takeover by a world government. Much
like the ideas discussed in the Report From Iron Mountain, he uses the threat of
global warming to justify totalitarian control:
"Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effects has been way
understimated, and that the catastrophic effects are actually going to set in 10
years from now, and not 100 years from now or something.
Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today, we'd probably have
a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing to it, because that would be the only
method for survival that anyone could think of. I'd even agree to it, because
there's just no other alternatives right now."
(Understanding Power, 388)
Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating a fascist takeover because the ends
justify the means. This is classic problem-reaction-solution programming, as he
points to the real threat of pollution and then offers the solution of tyranny
Peak Oil
As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded and amplified by
Globalist oil, banking, and drug cartels, with specific help from the
Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF, along with other phony NGO's like the Sierra
Club and Greenpeace consistently call for population reduction. Additionally
these groups push the flat earth thesis of "Peak Oil," predicting that oil
supplies will soon run out and of course...require massive worldwide population
reductions.
Chomsky posted an entry called "Peak Oil" on his blog in June, 2004, writing the
following: "The basic theory is incontrovertible. The only questions have to do
with timing and cost."
Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr, Chomsky said the following of Peak
Oil:
"There's another side to this, there's a sense in which it's advantageous if the
oil peak is earlier. The reason why is it will compel the world, primarily the
U.S. here, to move toward something
like sustainable energy. If there's unbounded amounts of hydrocarbons, we're
just going to destroy the environment for human life or most biological life, so
the earlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be catastrophic, it
could also be beneficial."
The "beneficial" aspects Chomsky discusses are likely the resulting population
control and starvation that would ensue from such a shortage.
But, in reality, oil is abiotic and constantly regenerating. This, while huge
wells go untapped in Russia, Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria, Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia,
Iraq, Alaska, Venezuela, Bolivia, Norway, and the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally,
refinery capacity has been deliberately shut down by the oil oligopoly in order
to create artificial supply shortages. Market prices are controlled by the
Anglo-American cartel and they intend to use this as a vehicle for engineered
crises. At this years Bilderberg meeting Henry Kissinger reportedly predicted
$100 a barrel oil within a year. The only possible result is a complete
worldwide depression.
It is within the "radical" Left that horror stories of diminishing oil find
their home. Even within the 9-11 truth movement, authors like Mike Ruppert and
Nafeez Ahmed have attempted to attach Peak Oil as the reason for government
engineering of 9-11 and the wars in the Middle East. By polluting the activist
movements with Peak Oil lies, the Globalists have created an army of strong
advocates for $5 a gallon gasoline.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
Another triumph of Chomsky's disinfo campaign has been the active denial of the
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neocon group that published
radical statements calling for world war, population control, and a worldwide
police state back in 2000. The signatures on the documents included Dick Cheney
and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald
Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Eliot Abrams.
It was Zakheim who previously ran Systems Planning Inc., which made
remote-control software for commercial airliners. Also as comptroller of the
Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of taxpayer money without explanation. Yet
his corruption was not singular; after Bush took his figurehead position in the
stolen election of 2000, all of the PNAC radicals became the architects of 9-11
and purveyors of pre-war lies about Iraq.
Their infamous "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document, produced in 2000 before
9-11, reads like prophecy, calling for theater wars against Iraq, Iran, and
North Korea. They also admitted that "Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." September 11,
anyone?
They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large sectors of the
human population. The document states: "[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare
that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the
realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC cabal, whose mad
plans for world domination read like the lost chapters of Mein Kampf?
If the Left Gatekeepers won't discuss these published documents, how can we
expect them to research the true history of AIDS and the potential emerging
avian flu? Should we be surprised when they fail to mention the 60 plus dead
microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading researchers in emerging
viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an expose of the heavy metals and
biological agents in chemtrails?
Isreal/Zionists
Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists linked to the Likud
party in Israel, who presented similar plans to Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu in 1996 ("Policy for a Clean Break").
Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by followers for his
books like "The Fateful Triangle" which detail many Israeli war crimes.
Furthermore he often criticizes the Isreali-linked network dominating U.S.
foreign policy. But as always, Chomsky again avoids the hardcore issues, instead
speaking in glittering generalities.
For example, he remains mute on the "Office of Special Plans," the ad-hoc nerve
center of pre-war Iraq propaganda, run of Cheney's office. It was here that
Zionist moles like Paul Wolfowitz, Larry Franklin, Douglas Feith, Stephen
Cambone, and Richard Perle cooked up phony WMD threats, links 9-11, and
collaboration between secular Iraq and Al-Qaeda.
Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud party and
intelligence syndicate Mossad, operated a two-way spy network; just as
manufactured propaganda flowed from Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S. secrets on
Iran secretly floated into Sharon's war cabinet.
In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia don of all lobbying
cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top level AIPAC officers like Steve Rosen
often acted as a go-between, then using that same fake intelligence to
strong-arm the Congress where they control both sides..
All parties mentioned, from Rosen to Franklin, are now under investigation from
the FBI and Justice Department for the aforementioned crimes. Major articles in
the Washington Post now admit Franklin, working with Feith and Cambone, was
passing secrets to Israel through AIPAC. Chomsky has never spoken publically
about any of these topics, and certainly not the Mossad involvement in
false-flag terror events like the USS Liberty and connections to 9-11.
Vote Fraud
When he isn't busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11 or the crimes of the
CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying the vote fraud of 2004, which ushered
in another term for the neocon dictatorship. Chomsky often brags that he does
not vote in presidential elections, noting that both sides are owned by
corporations. But he has openly denied the role of electronic voting fraud in
2000 and the more prominent example of 2004. In 2004, exit polls in Ohio and
Florida showed John Kerry winning by a comfortable margin, but mysteriously
numbers showed a Bush victory.
The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State in Ohio, Ken
Blackwell, managed Bush's campaign in the state, much like Katherine Harris did
in Florida during 2000. Diebold, the company which makes most of the electronic
voting machines, is crawling with former CIA and NSA members and used convicted
felons to design their software. The Diebold CEO Walden O'Dell is a Bush Pioneer
and wrote in a GOP fundraising letter that he was "committed to delivering
electoral votes to the President."
The Diebold code is private and has been exposed as being easily hacked by Bev
Harris at BlackBoxVoting.org. In North Carolina and Georgia, machines were
throwing out 5,000 block votes for Bush without explanation. But none of this
seems to interest Chomsky, who finds the accusations of vote fraud to be without
merit:
"I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate count in itself is a random
effect. As for collusion, yes, there are concerns, but concerns are not
evidence. The problem that concerns you may or may not be real, but in my view,
even if we take the worst case scenario, it is still marginal --
just as the Florida chads were marginal in the 2000 elections. I know of no
reason to suppose that electronic voting will have more than a random effect."
Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of electronic voting
because it would awaken too many people to the total bankruptcy of the system.
It is important that college activists at Berkeley think their vote for Ralph
Nader counted. If they knew the entire game was rigged like a Don King boxing
match, too many illusions would break down.
World Government
Chomsky plays the left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a false dialectic
of the evil American imperialist as the antagonist aggressor, contrasted by the
savior UN world government as the benevolent deux ex machina.
This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist U.S. against the godly UN
fits the classic MO of "poisoning the well." Essentially, Chomsky acts as a
re-direct agent: he acknowledges many crimes of American foreign policy and then
offers world government and international law as the solution.
The Globalists have long been masters of such a paradigm. In the early part of
the 20th century, the same Wall Street bankers crafted the doctrines of
Communism. While posing as a workers' liberation theology, it pushed for a
central bank, world army, world court, world government, and the abolition of
religion, private property, and the nation state.
Like other "anarchist" agent provacatuers such as John Zerzan (who helped train
violent mobs to ruin the Seattle WTO protests in 1999), Chomsky has called for
the elimination of private property. He argues, "that some form of council
communism is the natural form of revolutionary socialism in an industrial
society."
In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination of the nation-state
and national sovereignty to be replaced by a one world government:
"Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary would be a breakdown of the
nation-state system- because I think that's not a viable system. It's not
necessarily the natural form of human organization." (314)
Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines, is essentially
endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the breakdown of national
sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.
Noam Chomsky is a shameless world government pimp, and has heaped lavish praise
on men like Bertrand Russell who helped designed the New World Order. Lucky for
him, Chomsky has been publicly rewarded for his faithful service to the UN
cause. In Febraury 2004, he received the Award of Excellence at the UN
Correspondents Association Club in New York. Previous winners included Globalist
assets like Mikhail Gorbachev.
UNESCO
Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is it any surprise he
supports some of the worst UN programs? U.N.E.S.C.O, the nightmare UN vehicle
posing as an "aid" organization, finds a strong advocate with Chomsky.
Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller clan, U.N.E.S.C.O
projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda into American schools and with the
goal of eventually merging the curriculum with Mexico and Canada in the proposed
Panamerican Union; and seizing control of huge swaths of American federal lands
through "UN World Heritage" sites. The first U.N.E.S.C.O chief Julian Huxley
said during his tenure in 1948:
"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global
in extent... It can stress the transfer of full sovereignty from separate
nations to a world political organization Political unification in some sort of
world government will be requiredto help the emergence of a single world
culture."
But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of the UN, endorses the goals of U.N.E.S.C.O
wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil conservatives who question its motives:
"U.N.E.S.C.O - because it's working for the Third World-we practically put them
out of business. The United States launched a huge propaganda campaign against
U.N.E.S.C.O. in the 1970's and Eighties- it was full of outrageous lies, totally
fabricated, but nevertheless it sufficed to eliminate the Third World
orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and make it stop doing things it was doing around
the Third World, like improving literacy and health care and so on. (86)
PROPAGANDA
Many credit Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" with being the premier study of
government propaganda. In Leftist circles it is hailed as a Bible, a rite of
passage for any true activist to understand the system. But again, Chomsky's
work, while appearing radical, is actually gatekeeper disinfo.
Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that newspapers diminish
American war crimes while exaggerating those of foreign governments. Such a
point is easy to prove, and he does so in his own droll and methodical method.
Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant in the room:
direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and journalists beginning in the
1950's under Operation Mockingbird.
Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program which covertly put
major publishing, newspaper, and media outlets, as well as thousands of
individual reporters under direct agency control. Agents included Ben Bradlee at
Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life, and Arthur Sulzberger of The New York
Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington Post, and Joseph Harrison Christian
Science Monitor.
Shouldn't this a significant development for a historian authoring an honest
study of propaganda? After all who is to say that this program doesn't still
continue? The Bush administration has admitted spending hundreds of millions on
fake newscasts and paying individual reporters like Armstrong Williams to push
talking points in newspapers. What about the times they haven't been caught?
Exactly how many mainstream commentary and news outlets work with the CIA and
White House?
Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly news on ABC, CBS, and
NBC are almost exactly the same, while Newsweek, Time, and the New York Times
push the elitist agenda on cue (as seen most prominently in the run up to the
war in Iraq).
Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between the Bilderberg
Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn't this concern the so-called
radical anarchist, when media editors attend secret meetings calling for
eugenics, world government, and a cashless society control grid?
Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek, Economist, Washington Post, New
York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news outlet in between have attended the
world government meetings.
Further, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly calls for a
Panamerican Union and the end of American national sovereignty? The CFR counts
amongst its members major editors, owners, and journalists in media outlets from
PBS to CBS, CNN to News Corp., New Republic to U.S. News and World Report.
Aren't these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda Chomsky
identifies? In "Manufacturing Consent," Chomsky takes limited aim at an easy
target. But he fails to dig deeper and examine the actual reasons why the
propaganda permeates the mainstream media opinion. Clearly the influence of the
CIA, CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House have turned major media outlets
into little more than docile commissars. Furthermore, the interlocking interests
of media owners with the military industrial complex have served to sway content
even further.
Chomsky's "classic" study is little more than a limited hangout project. He is
merely shooting the messengers, blaming journalistic "bias" while failing to
follow the trail of money, power, corruption, and black propaganda. Instead, he
identifies some passive propaganda and is hailed as a brilliant analyst and
purveyor of truth by the Leftist minions. But his true achievement is ignoring
the reasons behind the lies, as he executes a masterful bait and switch tactic.
Is it a coincidence that Chomsky's co-author for "Manufacturing Consent," Edward
Herman, has also denied any government complicity in 9-11?
While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected the art.
CONCLUSIONS
Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devices for the Globalists
because they help define the limits of the false left-right paradigm. Much like
David Horowitz, a former Leftist, currently does for the radical Right. Is it a
surprise that he edited a book called "The Anti-Chomsky Reader?" It should only
be natural since they both serve the same role of gatekeeper.
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele Malkin, William
Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right Gatekeepers. They
criticize the failures of liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush
worshipping, illegal wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our
Constitutional rights for "security." In doing so they pollute the conservative
movement and help marginalize true conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron
Paul, and groups like Gun Owners of America.
Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write about the crimes of
American imperialism and then call for population control, gun control, global
government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave New World society.
The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act of appearing
radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement and murder. In all
likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda scientists at the
venerable Tavistock institute in London and adjuncts of the CIA's Mockingbird
program; clearly the Left's denial of 9-11 truths has been too coordinated too
have simply been a freak occurrence.
In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between pawns like
Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.
All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully crafted false
paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices. Thus at either
extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky to Horowitz, one
finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global government. This is the
genius of the New World Order, their complete castration of free political will
through carefully managed propaganda agents. The rest of the media jackals serve
as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and power hungry sycophants with
massive egos and more concern for their career than the truth.
Noam Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper associates must be actively exposed for
their role in the propaganda system. For nearly 40 years since they infiltrated
the activist movement, these Left gatekeepers have made the activist movements
impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective. Thus instead of understanding
their enslavement, many activists end up calling for tighter chains by echoing
Chomsky's
calls for gun control, population control, and a world government under the UN.
They end up critiquing the Iraq disaster without seeing government involvement
in 9-11 and the CIA/MI-6/Mossad creation known as Al-Qaeda.
Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly push real activists
into dead-end solutions.
Until they are vocally exposed, the Left will continue to remain a managed asset
of the New World Order.
_____________________________________________________________
*** Daniel L. Abrahamson can be reached at DLAmedia@yahoo.com
http://www.noam-chomsky.com/
Click
Here to learn how to simultaneously
download mp3 files and play in sequence
http://www.world-of-chomsky.com/
CLICK HERE FOR THE MOST RECENT CHOMSKY AUDIO AND VIDEO FILE LINKS
| 1. | Noam_chomsky_-_vs_-_george_bush stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec http://stream.paranode.com/imc/alberta/noam_chomsky_-_vs_-_george_bush.mp3 |
|
| 2. | Chomsky_porto_alegre_feb2003_lb uk.indymedia.org, 55 min 11 sec |
|
| 3. | Washingtondc
IndyMedia - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq www.dc.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 4. | Chomsky_nov_4_02_talk boston.indymedia.org, 22 min 13 sec |
|
| 5. | Chomsky_nov_4_02_talk boston.indymedia.org, 22 min 13 sec |
|
| 6. | Independent
Media Center - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq, indymedia.org www.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 7. | Questions
and Answers - Noam Chomsky-Houston 10-18-02 mke.indymedia.org, 86 min 50 sec |
|
| 8. | -
Chomsky Intro Houston101802 mke.indymedia.org, 22 min 35 sec |
|
| 9. | -
Noam Chomsky-Houston TX 101802 mke.indymedia.org, 67 min 59 sec |
|
| 10. | Cultual
Imperialism-Links and Sources Cited - Noam Chomsky on Globalization (full
audio interview), Cultual Imperialism-Links and Sources Cited www.arts.arizona.edu, 14 min 21 sec |
| 21. | Seattle
Indymedia - Chomsky Vs Bush Iraq, Seattle Indymedia - webcast
news seattle.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 22. | Independent
Media Center - Chomsky-1970, indymedia.org www.indymedia.org, 56 min 43 sec |
|
| 23. | Government
In The Future, Noam Chomsky - Feb 16/1970 www.kpfx.org, 56 min 43 sec |
|
| 24. | Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq, la.indymedia.org la.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 25. | Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq, la.indymedia.org la.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 26. | Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 27. | Chomsky_vs__bush__iraq stream.paranode.com, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 28. | Boston
IndyMedia - Chomsky-vs-bush-iraq boston.indymedia.org, 4 min 46 sec |
|
| 29. | Mayday
IndyMedia - Government In The Future, Noam Chomsky - Feb
16/1970 www.indymedia.org, 56 min 43 sec |
|
| 30. | Boston
IndyMedia - Chomsky 1 metafilter.com, 28 min 44 sec |
| 31. | Chomsky-
Gravitate server1.sxsw.com, 4 min 9 sec |
|
| 32. | Chomsky-
Gravitate, SXSW 2002 Bands bands sxsw.com, 4 min 9 sec |
|
| 33. | Enlightenment
Principles, Noam Chomsky www.indymedia.org, 3 min 20 sec |
|
| 34. | Who
Killed Noam Chomsky?, TV audio.musicbuilder.com, 5 min 35 sec |
|
| 35. | Mayday
IndyMedia - Enlightenment Principles, Noam Chomsky www.indymedia.org, 3 min 20 sec |
|
| 36. | Http://www.frognet.net/~absent/NoamBennet.mp3, Chomsky
to Debate William Bennett 5/30 5:20am : SF www.sf.indymedia.org, 8 min 19 sec |
|
| 37. | Case
Studies In Hypocrisy:U.S. Human Rights Policy - U.S. Prisons, Noam
Chomsky: Prisons in America : SF Indymedia sf.indymedia.org, 6 min 19 sec |
|
| 38. | Between
The Lines Week Ending 5/3/02, Between The Lines www.wpkn.org, 29 min 1 sec |
|
| 39. | Index
of /sound, radioproject.org www.radioproject.org, 56 min 21 sec |
|
| 40. | Program:Narco
Cover, Program:Narco Cover www.radioproject.org, 79 min 54 sec |
| 41. | >>EVIL
VS. EVIL (mp3), The Ancient Ecstatic Brotherhood of PARANOISE www.paranoise.com, 3 min 15 sec |
|
| 42. | Clarence:
Cultura e Spettacolo - Società delle Menti - Audio Files (), Clarence:
Cultura e Spettacolo - Società de www.clarence.com, 3 min 40 sec |
|
| 43. | Fierce
Invalids Home From..., Tom Robbins www.clarence.com, 7 min 44 sec |
|
| 44. | Part
4, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 27 min 6 sec |
|
| 45. | Part
1, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 36 min 21 sec |
|
| 46. | Part
3, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 25 min 41 sec |
|
| 47. | Part
2, G7 Welcoming Committee Records - News www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 24 min 34 sec |
|
| 48. | Burnt
Norton, T.S. Eliot www.clarence.com, 10 min 58 sec |
|
| 49. | G7
Welcoming Committee Records - Releases, G7 Welcoming
Committee Records - Releases www.g7welcomingcommittee.com, 3 min 52 sec |
|
| 50. | If
I Told Him, Gertrude Stein www.clarence.com, 3 min 36 sec |
Noam
Chomsky - Welfare for the Rich - in the United States, our tax dollars
supply social welfare for the very rich, while the poor experience the rigors of
the free market. 1.1 megabytes in length.
Noam
Chomsky - Delusion - writers employed by the corporate media are not
necessarily conscious of engaging in deception. Instead, they are
completely persuaded by corporate propaganda. Otherwise they would not be
employed. 1 megabyte in length.
Noam
Chomsky - Indoctrination of the very young into the system. How the
system earmarks children for success or failure by their tendency to conform,
obey, and be passive spectators (America's ideal worker). 1.2 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Labor Struggles of the early American factory workers who wrote
that the new spirit of the Age was, "Gain wealth, forgetting all but
self." 900k.
Noam
Chomsky - Authoritarian Structures work to control the public mind and crush
independent thinking and turn human beings into passive consumers of
mass-marketed products. 300k.
Noam Chomsky
- versus King George the First - exposes the embarrassing facts that Bush
Senior conveniently omitted regarding Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. 4.4
megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Free Market Fantasies - what precisely does it mean to be a
conservative in favor of the free market? 5.7 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Hypocrisy: Good Terror - there is "bad" terrorism and
"good" terrorism, according to America's rulers. The "good"
terrorism is practiced by American allies, such as Turkey, who commit atrocities
against millions of "irrelevant" people. 1.8 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky
- Old Wine, New Bottles - 1.1 megabytes.
Noam Chomsky -
Detering the NAFTA debate - 5 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - Responds to a Question - 3.5 megabytes.
Noam
Chomsky - The Globalization of Production
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision (13)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Corporate Attack on Working People (14)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Social Disintegration (17)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : Labor Loses in Clinton (20)
Noam
Chomsky - The Clinton Vision : What We Can Do (22)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (1)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (2)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (3)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (4)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (5)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (6)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (7)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (8)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (9)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (10)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (11)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (12)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (13)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (14)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (15)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (16)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (17)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (18)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (19)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (20)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (21)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (22)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (23)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (24)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (25)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (26)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (27)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (xx)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (dis)
Noam
Chomsky - Propaganda and Control of the Public Mind (zz)
Noam
Chomsky - Prospects for Democracy : U.S. Repression II (10)
Noam Chomsky
- Free Market Fantasies (05)
Noam
Chomsky - Culture of Solidarity - why labor unions are important to a
democratic society.
Noam Chomsky
- Torture - The Clinton Administration violates Article 14 and forcibly
returns the Haitians to their torture chamber.
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (01) Destroying American Industrial Unions
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (03) The Business Press Explains
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (07) Tyranny is Pure Freedom
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (08) Strikebreakers
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (09) In the Case of Mexico
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (10) Crime Pays
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (15) The Wealthy Classes
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (16) Return to the Trenches
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (17) A Vicious Class War
Noam
Chomsky - Capital Rules (18) Selling the Capitalist Story
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-09)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-10)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-11)
Noam
Chomsky - Case Studies in Hypocrisy (2-12)
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (05) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (07) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (09) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (10) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (11) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (16) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - Class War (17) - The Attack on Working People
Noam
Chomsky - on Terrorism and the Media - Damon created this MP3 of Noam's
speech at FAIR's 15-year anniversary. (See http://www.fair.org/chomsky-town.html).
He spoke for about an hour about the war(s) on terrorism and the media. Thanks,
Damon! 14 megabytes.
nov2006